Articles
Reporting and analysis on recording, recognition, consent, Bluetooth awareness and the shared-space questions raised by wearable technology.
-
Wearer data
The Buyer Is Also Being Recorded
The bystander argument has made the wearer look like the party with power. They are the most instrumented person in the encounter.
-
Education
Camera Glasses Enter a School Through the Door Nobody Guards
Schools scrutinise the technology they buy. A device that walks in on somebody's face never passes through procurement.
-
Liability
Who Would You Even Sue
The enforcement mechanism with the best track record in biometric privacy needs a corporate defendant. A fleet of individual wearers does not provide one.
-
Capability coupling
The Camera and the Recognition Service Are Sold Separately
Rules assess devices one at a time. The harm lives in the combination, and joining the parts is now something any buyer can do.
-
Corporate privacy
Your Premises, Someone Else's Camera
Privacy programmes map what an organisation collects. A visitor's camera can enter a sensitive waiting room outside that register.
-
Civil liberties
What People Do Differently When They Suspect a Camera
Ambient capture costs more than the footage itself. It also changes how people behave when they cannot tell whether a device is present.
-
Service work
The Name Tag Is the Asymmetry
Most bystander arguments assume the recorded person is anonymous. Behind a counter, they are the only identified party in the encounter.
-
Schools and bystander privacy
Smart Glasses in Schools Need Clear Student Privacy Rules
Camera-equipped eyewear brings student privacy, consent, and online-abuse questions into a São Paulo classroom.
-
Australia
Australia’s Smart-Glasses Petition Opens a Privacy Debate
Australia's EN10357 petition asks Parliament to consider restrictions and consent rules for AI-enabled smart glasses in shared spaces.